Exodus wrote to Argos <=-
Just tell them if they support democrap, they are wrong.
Just tell them if they support democrap, they are wrong.
Oh, but that's Hate Speech. Or is it a Microagression? I can never remem all the nonsensical terms that they use.
Dmxrob wrote to Argos <=-
Huh? Harris - 48.3%, Trump - 49.8%
Where is this overwhelming win at?
I'm tired of letting people "make up facts" and I intend to be very
vocal and call out BS when I see it.
Dr. What wrote to Dmxrob <=-
First time a Republican won the popular vote for President in 20 years.
A simple look at any any Electoral map shows the vast majority of the country voted for Trump.
If you actually knew something (other than being told by your
programmers what to think), you would know that the President is not elected by popular vote. The intent was that the President have WIDE support - so the big population centers didn't effectively elect a President that the vast majority of the rest of the country didn't
want.
Ahh, yes. The usual Woke willful ignorance.
... Do ya really believe her when she says size don't matter?
___ MultiMail/Linux v0.52
--- Mystic BBS/QWK v1.12 A47 2021/12/25 (Windows/32)
* Origin: cold fusion - cfbbs.net - grand rapids, mi (21:1/616)
poindexter FORTRAN wrote to Dr. What <=-
First time a Republican won the popular vote for President in 20 years.
A simple look at any any Electoral map shows the vast majority of the country voted for Trump.
That's a common fallacy being used. Trump won the popular vote by
about
one and a half percentage points. Looking at a vote by state shows an
overwhelming red map. Vote by country and it's almost identical to a
map by population. Same data, different inference. Except, land
doesn't
vote in a popular election - but it makes a convincing visual.
If you actually knew something (other than being told by your
programmers what to think), you would know that the President is not elected by popular vote. The intent was that the President have WIDE support - so the big population centers didn't effectively elect a President that the vast majority of the rest of the country didn't
want.
The electoral college was drawn up in the 18th century as a compromise when no other elected their government using a popular vote. It was
later reinforced by the south as they gave slaves 3/5th representation.
There's an argument whether or not still has a place.
Ahh, yes. The usual Woke willful ignorance.
If you think only the other side if "programmed", you're mistaken.
poindexter FORTRAN wrote to Dr. What <=-
That's a common fallacy being used. Trump won the popular vote by
about
one and a half percentage points.
If you think only the other side if "programmed", you're mistaken.
Matty wrote to Dmxrob <=-
It's interesting that over 90 million registered voters did not vote in the election.
It's interesting that over 90 million registered voters did not vote in the election.
Yeah, the numbers were atypical this year.
Not really. The *ONLY* place that liberals win convincingly is in the
huge urban/city environments. Why should that demographic control the
entire country? It's a VERY obvious fact that the EC is still valid.
Respecting one another and STOP the polarization of our county. Focus on being
kind to one another, focus on respecting one another
and for crying out loud, quit ya bitching.
I actually like using Facebook mainly because I like seeing what my
friends are sharing. If there wasn't a good reason, I probably
wouldn't use it.
Nightfox wrote to Arelor <=-
I actually like using Facebook mainly because I like seeing what my friends are sharing. If there wasn't a good reason, I probably
wouldn't use it.
feel is inappropriate content like adult content. However, we need to somehow educate people that these platforms are not the best way to get your news, or at least educate how to vet so called news on these platforms. I don't know ho
people thought that this is the best methods of news content.
Well, TV and radio news are junk services and I think enough people knows that
already. This begs the question: if you know regular mainstream news outlets are junk, where will you get your news from?
Same here. It's really the only place where I can contact family members, and
have access to groups for my hobbies.
The fact that these services are designed to be addictive is the rub.
How do grown people counter a service designed by behavioral scientists
- let alone children?
Dumas Walker wrote to NEOSHOCK <=-
Indeed. There are people who not only get their news mostly from Twitter/X but that also believe that this is the best way to get it. <shrugs> If I know that is how they feel, I very much discount any information they share with me re: current events.
I don't think we can recover from social media, though - it's designed
for quick bites, quick dopamine hits, holding on to eyeballs as long as possible and is a wonderful growth media for disinformation.
Given Twitter and Facebook's alignment with Trump (either due to
economic benefit or not being threatened with jail time by the
president) I don't see anything changing.
Dumas Walker wrote to POINDEXTER FORTRAN <=-
I don't think FB is aligning with Trump so much as they are
disassociating with goverment oversight in general. I do agree that
their doing so right now is because they see writing on the wall.
I also don't think it matters which side they are aligned with. As
long as they are aligned to *either* side, they are going to turn a
blind eye to disinformation that benefits their side... and those on
their side will eat it up.
Sysop: | Angel Ripoll |
---|---|
Location: | Madrid, Spain |
Users: | 12 |
Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
Uptime: | 43:45:12 |
Calls: | 666 |
Calls today: | 3 |
Files: | 14,514 |
D/L today: |
2 files (75K bytes) |
Messages: | 63,488 |