From Maurice Kinal@1:153/7001 to Maurice Kinal on Tue Jun 20 01:53:18 2017
From this angle it is definetly ISO-8859-1 as the above characters
While in the editor it was true for all 3 but after saving and viewing it online the 3rd character was altered to "1" which it is here as well. Beats me
what went wrong but on the plus side it was 66% 'successful' and did confirm our suspicions about so-called LATIN-1 in BBBS's view of that particular BS.
What a crock. :-/
Life is good,
... Don't cry for me I have vi.
--- GNU bash, version 4.4.12(1)-release (x86_64-bonnell-linux-gnu)
* Origin: Little Mikey's Brain - Ladysmith BC, Canada (1:153/7001)
Mon Sep 12 14:34:33 2022
Sat Sep 17 23:56:59 2022
Thu Sep 22 07:42:25 2022
Tue Sep 27 10:30:09 2022