Wanted to run this by you for feedback. I've recently added markdown support for LovlyNet - a dedicated FTN for BinktermPHP nodes.
Would appreciate feedback on this idea.
My 2c: in case of something like that being implemented, could it be better to use a more general kludge, such as MARKUP?
^aMARKUP: Markdown 1.0
That would allow for specifying other formats, like BBCode, Gemtext, etc.
My 2c: in case of something like that being implemented, could it be better to use a more general kludge, such as MARKUP?
^aMARKUP: Markdown 1.0
That would allow for specifying other formats, like BBCode, Gemtext, etc.
This makes more sense to me.
I've done up a second draft based on this this feedback.
1. INTRODUCTION
---------------
This document defines the MARKUP kludge line for use in FidoNet-
compatible echomail and netmail messages. Its purpose is to indicate
that the body of a message is formatted using a named markup syntax, allowing capable reader software to render the message with appropriate formatting while remaining fully readable by legacy software that does
not support this kludge.
Unlike a Markdown-specific kludge, MARKUP provides a general mechanism
for identifying the body format of a message. This allows the same
extension point to be used for Markdown, BBCode, Gemtext, and other
formats without requiring a new kludge definition for each syntax.
2. DEFINITIONS
--------------
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in FTA-1006.
"Kludge line": A line in a FidoNet message body beginning with the
ASCII SOH character (0x01), used to carry machine-readable metadata
not intended for direct display to the end user.
"Markup syntax": A textual formatting language used within the visible message body to express structure or presentation, such as Markdown,
BBCode, or Gemtext.
3. THE MARKUP KLUDGE
--------------------
3.1 Syntax
The MARKUP kludge line has the following syntax:
^AMARKUP: <format> <version>
where ^A represents the ASCII SOH character (0x01), <format> is a
registered or otherwise well-known markup format identifier, and
<version> is a format version string meaningful within that format.
Examples:
^AMARKUP: Markdown 1.0
^AMARKUP: BBCode 1.0
^AMARKUP: Gemtext 1.0
3. THE MARKUP KLUDGE
--------------------
3.1 Syntax
The MARKUP kludge line has the following syntax:
^AMARKUP: <format> <version>
where ^A represents the ASCII SOH character (0x01), <format> is a
registered or otherwise well-known markup format identifier, and
<version> is a format version string meaningful within that format.
Examples:
^AMARKUP: Markdown 1.0
^AMARKUP: BBCode 1.0
^AMARKUP: Gemtext 1.0
There's the Synchronet-supported message markup format too: https://wiki.synchro.net/ref:markup
^AMARKUP: Markdown 1.0
^AMARKUP: StyleCodes 1.0
^AMARKUP: Markdown 1.0
^AMARKUP: StyleCodes 1.0
BinktermPHP 1.8.5 (to be released) now uses the MARKUP kludge and adds support for StyleCodes/Synchronet Message Markup. It continues to be enabled/disabled on a per network/uplink basis.
I've also posted a copy of the draft proposal to https://github.com/awehttam/binkterm-php/issues/161
Re: Re: MARKUP kludge
By: Matthew Asham to All on Tue Mar 03 2026 10:41 am
^AMARKUP: Markdown 1.0
^AMARKUP: StyleCodes 1.0
BinktermPHP 1.8.5 (to be released) now uses the MARKUP kludge and adds
support for StyleCodes/Synchronet Message Markup. It continues to be
enabled/disabled on a per network/uplink basis.
I've also posted a copy of the draft proposal to
https://github.com/awehttam/binkterm-php/issues/161
I think it's a good idea and thinking about how best to implement
support (both adding and consuming the kludges in Synchronet).
Maybe I missed it, but does your spec say if/how multiple MARKUP styles/kludges could be used in a single message?
| Sysop: | Angel Ripoll |
|---|---|
| Location: | Madrid, Spain |
| Users: | 18 |
| Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
| Uptime: | 06:35:29 |
| Calls: | 1,148 |
| Files: | 1,636 |
| D/L today: |
5 files (10K bytes) |
| Messages: | 66,440 |