Anyone here using or is familiar with the Luckymobile service?

https://luckymobile.ca

Recently, they reconfigured their packages.

Examples..

WAS:

$40/mo = 5GB data
$25/mo = 500MB data

NOW:

$40/mo = 74GB data
$34/mo = 50GB data
$29/mo = 20GB data

New first time users can get 35GB data for 2 years at the $29
pricepoint

Also.. is anyone using Luckymobile manual top-ups and
encountering balances that don't get used up?


--- OpenXP 5.0.58
* Origin: Ogg's Dovenet Point (723:320/1.9)
þ Synchronet þ CAPCITY2 * capcity2.synchro.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/Rlogin/HTTP

Anyone here using or is familiar with the Luckymobile service? https://luckymobile.ca

$40/mo = 74GB data
$34/mo = 50GB data
$29/mo = 20GB data
New first time users can get 35GB data for 2 years at the $29
pricepoint

Hmmm - this might be interesting, I use around 50-60GB a month. Hmmmmmm. I know Mint Mobile is a good alternative, but I'm still on Tmobile. Do you use the service??? How is it for youtube streaming on the network?



|07p|15AULIE|1142|07o
|08.........

Hello paulie420!

Anyone here using or is familiar with the Luckymobile service?
https://luckymobile.ca

[...]

New first time users can get 35GB data for 2 years at the
$29 pricepoint

Hmmm - this might be interesting, I use around 50-60GB a
month. Hmmmmmm. I know Mint Mobile is a good alternative,
but I'm still on Tmobile. Do you use the service??? How is
it for youtube streaming on the network?

Yes.. I've been with luckymobile.ca for several years.
Throughout the years the prices and data combos seemed to be
improving (ie. more data for the buck). They were the first
mobile service to offer "unlimited" (albiet, throttled) data -
and that is why I leaped to them after my first foray was with
Rogers. Prior to that, my first access to mobile was with the
Roger's Stick.

Rogers offered something like $30/mo for 2GB, 2G speeds, and
then overage/additional data was priced on a tiered basis in
500MB chunks or something like that. I used a local datausage
counter and tried to always below a certain amount to avoid
extra charges.

Then I just happend to hear about luckymobile.ca from a friend.
And.. for the same amount of money I was paying for Rogers, I
could get more data and unlimited 3G data (throttled to 128Kbps
max) ..and that seemed amazing compared to anything else out
there at the time.

The luckymobile service was incompatible with the Roger's Stick
device (even when I unlocked it) since 2G was not supported.
So.. I happend to have a Blackberry that wasn't being used for
anything except photos and wifi, and decided to try
luckymobile.

It worked really well, considering that my rural home location
was somewhat remote from most of the other towers in the area.
But one tower was basically due north from some large windows
in the home, and that was perfect.

Some other competitively priced mobile services do *not*
provide unlimited/throttled data unless you enter around the
$45/mo pricepoint. But the latest luckymobile plans seem to be
the best they have offered to date compared to the others here:
Publicmobile, Chatr, Virginmoble, Bell..

That is why I decided to give a shoutout about this. Maybe
someone would like to be aware of an alternative.


--- OpenXP 5.0.58
* Origin: Ogg's Dovenet Point (723:320/1.9)
þ Synchronet þ CAPCITY2 * capcity2.synchro.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/Rlogin/HTTP

Yes.. I've been with luckymobile.ca for several years.
Throughout the years the prices and data combos seemed to be
improving (ie. more data for the buck). They were the first
mobile service to offer "unlimited" (albiet, throttled) data -
and that is why I leaped to them after my first foray was with
Rogers. Prior to that, my first access to mobile was with the
Roger's Stick.

Then I just happend to hear about luckymobile.ca from a friend.
And.. for the same amount of money I was paying for Rogers, I
could get more data and unlimited 3G data

Nice - I didn't first notice the .ca in the address, hopefully others in Canada area able to use lucky.



|07p|15AULIE|1142|07o
|08.........

Hello paulie420!

Nice - I didn't first notice the .ca in the address,
hopefully others in Canada area able to use lucky.

I was *wondering* why you were going on about cable, when I
clearly mentioned mobile. ;) Anyway, I tried to steer the
topic back to mobile matters.

BTW.. are there any comparable price+data schemes in the USA,
or does this look like mobile in Canada still remains the
highest priced?

--- OpenXP 5.0.58
* Origin: Ogg's Dovenet Point (723:320/1.9)
þ Synchronet þ CAPCITY2 * capcity2.synchro.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/Rlogin/HTTP

Ogg wrote to paulie420 <=-

BTW.. are there any comparable price+data schemes in the USA,
or does this look like mobile in Canada still remains the
highest priced?

I mentioned cable just because of the bait and switch, not because of
relevance to data plan comparisons.

I'm on a MVNO called Cricket, wholly owned by AT&T. Their $60 plan
includes hot spot and 25 GB of data per 30 days. After that, they scale
speeds down to 3G - enough for basics, but not streaming.

They have a $10 autopay discount, then as you add more lines each line
is successively cheaper. I pay $130/month for 4 "unlimited" lines. If I
were on AT&T, I'd pay twice that, and they wouldn't warn me when we went
over, they just happily charge overage fees.



... This is it -- the center of the maze...
--- MultiMail/Win v0.52
þ Synchronet þ .: realitycheckbbs.org :: scientia potentia est :.

BTW.. are there any comparable price+data schemes in the USA,
or does this look like mobile in Canada still remains the
highest priced?

We have Mint mobile over here which is similar - pay for GBs and its geared towards budget plans... but thats around the budget mobile $$$ I see here, too.

I wanna switch - I'm just scared that I use too much data and/or the service won't be as good as T-Mobile.



|07p|15AULIE|1142|07o
|08.........

Re: Re: luckymobile, anyone?
By: paulie420 to Ogg on Tue Apr 16 2024 05:47 pm

I wanna switch - I'm just scared that I use too much data and/or the service won't be as good as T-Mobile.

I've heard a lot of people say T-Mobile service isn't very good.. And years ago, I knew someone who had T-Mobile, and she had a lot of dropped phone calls.

Currently I'm using Verizon's budget plan at $35/month (there's a tax that makes it $36.65/month). It starts out at $55/month and then goes down after a certain number of months as a loyalty discount. I think the service has been pretty good. I've had it for over 3 years now and I haven't gone over the data limit. I tend to use data more when I'm at home on my wifi though. Also, with Verizon, you have a SIM card, so you can use any compatible unlocked phone if you want to. I used to be with a budget carrier (Boost Mobile, and Virgin Mobile before Boost took over), and you were basically locked to their service with their phones, so I'm glad I can use basically any phone now.

Nightfox

---
þ Synchronet þ Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.com

Re: Re: luckymobile, anyone?
By: Nightfox to paulie420 on Tue Apr 16 2024 06:47 pm

I've heard a lot of people say T-Mobile service isn't very good.. And years ago, I knew someone who had T-Mobile, and she had a lot of dropped phone calls.

I've been using T-Mobile for about 10 years, AT&T before that. T-Mobile is at least as good as AT&T was, better Internationally, and the voice quality between T-Mobile users is pretty spectacular (uses special high-fidelity modes when making calls in-network).
--
digital man (rob)

Sling Blade quote #23:
Karl: I reckon I'm gonna have to get used to looking at pretty people.
Norco, CA WX: 60.0øF, 53.0% humidity, 0 mph ENE wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs ---
þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net

Hello paulie420!

I wanna switch - I'm just scared that I use too much data and/or the service won't be as good as T-Mobile.

When I first learned about luckymobile.ca, I decided to try it
for a month. All I had to do was buy the SIM and register it
myself. If the service wasn't good enough (at home, far from
cell towers) I figured I could just drop it by not paying for
the 2nd month.

Well.. it turned out that the service was quite solid and the
signal was exellent. I don't remember the data tier that I
started with, the whole pricing structure and unlimited/
throttled data was much better than I had with Roger's and
their overrage charges. So.. the switch was easy to make.

Throttled data was still good enough for FTN, emails and most
simple www usage.


--- OpenXP 5.0.58
* Origin: Ogg's Dovenet Point (723:320/1.9)
þ Synchronet þ CAPCITY2 * capcity2.synchro.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/Rlogin/HTTP

Hello Nightfox!

..I used to be with a budget carrier (Boost Mobile, and
Virgin Mobile before Boost took over), and you were
basically locked to their service with their phones, so I'm
glad I can use basically any phone now.

Didn't the FCC make it manadatory for all mobile devices to be
unlocked at some point? So.. technically, you should be able
to use any device today that *was* sold as locked and get that
company to you give you the unlock codes?


--- OpenXP 5.0.58
* Origin: Ogg's Dovenet Point (723:320/1.9)
þ Synchronet þ CAPCITY2 * capcity2.synchro.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/Rlogin/HTTP

Digital Man wrote to Nightfox <=-

I've been using T-Mobile for about 10 years, AT&T before that. T-Mobile
is at least as good as AT&T was, better Internationally, and the voice quality between T-Mobile users is pretty spectacular (uses special high-fidelity modes when making calls in-network). --

Tmobile was great in the SF bay area, horrible out here on the coast.
AT&T and Verizon duke it out to see who's less worse, but I end up using
wi-fi calling at my house all the time because the 5g signal isn't
sufficient.

I do remember Tmobile call quality, I had a hundred or so lines through
them for my company back in the 2010s. Great quality, but dead spots on
my commute - I knew exactly where my calls would drop.

Tmobile was the first that I'd heard of to do wifi calling - I was in
Mexico in 2010 or so, and they'd just rolled out UMA, as they called it.
I hooked up the local wifi, got dial tone from Dallas/Fort Worth, and
made local calls to the US from there. Very cool.




... Always the first steps
--- MultiMail/Win v0.52
þ Synchronet þ .: realitycheckbbs.org :: scientia potentia est :.

Re: luckymobile, anyone?
By: Ogg to Nightfox on Wed Apr 17 2024 07:29 am

..I used to be with a budget carrier (Boost Mobile, and Virgin Mobile
before Boost took over), and you were basically locked to their service
with their phones, so I'm glad I can use basically any phone now.

Didn't the FCC make it manadatory for all mobile devices to be unlocked at some point? So.. technically, you should be able to use any device today that *was* sold as locked and get that company to you give you the unlock codes?

I hadn't heard about that.. But even then, a lot of the cell phones sold by those budget phone carriers don't even have a place for a SIM card. They're locked to the carrier and there's nothing you can really do about it, so even if there was a way to unlock those phones, I doubt it would really be useful if you can't put a different SIM card in it.

Nightfox

---
þ Synchronet þ Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.com

I've heard a lot of people say T-Mobile service isn't very good.. And years ago, I knew someone who had T-Mobile, and she had a lot of dropped phone calls.

It works well for me - all depends on where you're at, too. For example, in Austin, TX T-Mobile is one of the best... but theres a few dead spots around the rural areas in the pacific northwest.

Currently I'm using Verizon's budget plan at $35/month (there's a tax
that makes it $36.65/month). It starts out at $55/month and then goes down after a certain number of months as a loyalty discount.

My issue is that I often use 60-70Gb per month. I pay around $120 for 2 lines but know my daughter and I burn a lot of data each month... I really don't use the phone features much and could get away with some VOIP solution and switch over to data only.

I remember a time when Apple was attempting to move iPhones to all-data but they never got there. Its one of the reasons they went Verizon only for the 1st year - supposedly they wanted to sell the data plans and make iPhones fully functional w/o cellular... I bet if they'd of been trying to doso now as opposed to more than a decade ago that that would have been more a possibility.



|07p|15AULIE|1142|07o
|08.........

Hello Nightfox!

Didn't the FCC make it manadatory for all mobile devices to be unlocked

I hadn't heard about that.. But even then, a lot of the cell phones sold by those budget phone carriers don't even have a place for a SIM card. They're locked to the carrier and there's nothing you can really do about it, so even if there was a way to unlock those phones, I doubt it would really be useful if you can't put a different SIM card in it.

Sorry, I hadn't heard of the mobile devices without SIM cards.

I have no experience with "throw away cellphones". Maybe those
are what you speak of?

I just know that early on, the devices were locked to the
seller. But there was always the ability to change the SIM.

--- OpenXP 5.0.58
* Origin: Ogg's Dovenet Point (723:320/1.9)
þ Synchronet þ CAPCITY2 * capcity2.synchro.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/Rlogin/HTTP

Re: luckymobile, anyone?
By: Ogg to Nightfox on Wed Apr 17 2024 07:14 pm

Sorry, I hadn't heard of the mobile devices without SIM cards.

There's a new thing called "eSIM", maybe that's what they're referring to: https://www.digitaltrends.com/mobile/esim-explainer/
--
digital man (rob)

Breaking Bad quote #27:
Other than Gomey here pees sitting down, here's what we know. - Hank Schrader Norco, CA WX: 60.4øF, 56.0% humidity, 0 mph ENE wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs ---
þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net

Hello Digital Man!

Sorry, I hadn't heard of the mobile devices without SIM cards.

There's a new thing called "eSIM", maybe that's what they're referring
to: https://www.digitaltrends.com/mobile/esim-explainer/

Locked-devices with physical SIMs predate eSIM tech which
emerged in 2016.

However, "Different mobile telephones may not support an eSIM,
may have a permanently programmed, unchangeable one, or one
that can be reprogrammed for any carrier that supports the
technology." ..so, there does seem to be a case were there
are "unchageable" eSIMs.

Since Dec 2017, "The CRTC, Canada's wireless regulator, has
ruled that every cellphone sold in the country must be
unlocked, and carriers can no longer charge their customers to
unlock their current devices"

Something similar took place in USA.

So there is a narrow window when eSIM tech emerged 2016 and
when the unlocking was mandated, and where some devices have
the "unchangeable" eSIM variety.

But *all* mobile devices after 2017 have to be unlockable.



--- OpenXP 5.0.58
* Origin: Ogg's Dovenet Point (723:320/1.9)
þ Synchronet þ CAPCITY2 * capcity2.synchro.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/Rlogin/HTTP

I just know that early on, the devices were locked to the
seller. But there was always the ability to change the SIM.

My first mobile may have had a SIM in it somewhere but you would have had
to take it apart to find it. It didn't have a "SIM port" like the
otherwise closed Apple (and many Android) devices do today. My second
phone, a flip phone that I really liked, may have had a SIM in it also but
I don't remember seeing one in the small battery compartment.

I got the first phone c2000 and the flip phone sometime between then and
2014, when I got my first "smart" phone. It had a SIM card in the
battery compartment.


* SLMR 2.1a * May The Force be with you...
---
þ Synchronet þ CAPCITY2 * capcity2.synchro.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/Rlogin/HTTP

Ogg wrote to Nightfox <=-

Didn't the FCC make it manadatory for all mobile devices to be
unlocked at some point? So.. technically, you should be able
to use any device today that *was* sold as locked and get that
company to you give you the unlock codes?

I'm not sure what the law is, but my carrier requires that you have
service for 6 months before unlocking a phone. It seems only fair, they discount the price of the phone with the expectation of getting the
discount back with service. Otherwise we'd all need to pay full price
all the time.



... YORGAMAK HAS ARRIVED AND WILL INITIATE DESTRUCTIMATION.
--- MultiMail/Win v0.52
þ Synchronet þ .: realitycheckbbs.org :: scientia potentia est :.

Ogg wrote to Nightfox <=-

Sorry, I hadn't heard of the mobile devices without SIM cards.

They're called eSIM "cards", I'm assuming you just enter the SIM
information into the phone and it activates.

I have no experience with "throw away cellphones". Maybe those
are what you speak of?

Those are typically regular pre-paid cellular phones that you buy with
cash.



... YORGAMAK HAS ARRIVED AND WILL INITIATE DESTRUCTIMATION.
--- MultiMail/Win v0.52
þ Synchronet þ .: realitycheckbbs.org :: scientia potentia est :.

Re: Re: luckymobile, anyone?
By: paulie420 to Nightfox on Wed Apr 17 2024 06:13 pm

I remember a time when Apple was attempting to move iPhones to all-data

What does that mean?

but they never got there. Its one of the reasons they went Verizon only for the 1st year - supposedly they wanted to sell the data plans and make

I remember the iPhone only being available through AT&T for the first year or two in the US..

Nightfox

---
þ Synchronet þ Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.com

Re: luckymobile, anyone?
By: Ogg to Nightfox on Wed Apr 17 2024 07:14 pm

Sorry, I hadn't heard of the mobile devices without SIM cards.

I have no experience with "throw away cellphones". Maybe those are what you speak of?

No. I had a couple of Samsung Galaxy phones with Virgin Mobile, and they didn't have SIM cards; they also had a custom ROM on them that showed a Virgin Mobile logo when you turned on the phone, etc..

Nightfox

---
þ Synchronet þ Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.com

Re: luckymobile, anyone?
By: Digital Man to Ogg on Wed Apr 17 2024 10:55 pm

Sorry, I hadn't heard of the mobile devices without SIM cards.

There's a new thing called "eSIM", maybe that's what they're referring to: https://www.digitaltrends.com/mobile/esim-explainer/

I don't know if the phones I had were using eSIM. I had used Virgin Mobile off and on, but steadily between about 2011 to 2021. Most of the smartphones I had with Virgin Mobile didn't have a SIM card and were locked to Virgin Mobile - Maybe they were using eSIM, I'm not sure.

Nightfox

---
þ Synchronet þ Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.com

Re: luckymobile, anyone?
By: Ogg to Digital Man on Thu Apr 18 2024 07:47 am

There's a new thing called "eSIM", maybe that's what they're referring
to: https://www.digitaltrends.com/mobile/esim-explainer/

Locked-devices with physical SIMs predate eSIM tech which emerged in 2016.

However, "Different mobile telephones may not support an eSIM, may have a permanently programmed, unchangeable one, or one that can be reprogrammed for any carrier that supports the technology." ..so, there does seem to be a case were there are "unchageable" eSIMs.

Since Dec 2017, "The CRTC, Canada's wireless regulator, has ruled that every cellphone sold in the country must be unlocked, and carriers can no longer charge their customers to unlock their current devices"

Something similar took place in USA.

So there is a narrow window when eSIM tech emerged 2016 and when the unlocking was mandated, and where some devices have the "unchangeable" eSIM variety.

I'd say less than 5-7 years ago, maybe a little longer, all sim card tech phones were GSM, att, etc.. and CDMA phones were mainly the locked phones, around here that was verizon, sprint, and some off their affiliates like virgin mobile, most all the ones that ran on CDMA were locked to their carriers, a lot of the GSMs could swap. afaik with 4-5g now all rolled out and 2 and 3g finally gone, I presume CDMA is now only used (maybe in radios?). but around here anyway, back in those days. verizon was king and none of their phones had sim card.
---
Tim (kk4qbn)
+o kk4qbn.synchro.net
þ Synchronet þ KK4QBN BBS - kk4qbn.synchro.net - Chatsworth, GA USA

Re: luckymobile, anyone?
By: Nightfox to Ogg on Thu Apr 18 2024 09:43 am

Sorry, I hadn't heard of the mobile devices without SIM cards.

I have no experience with "throw away cellphones". Maybe those are what
you speak of?

No. I had a couple of Samsung Galaxy phones with Virgin Mobile, and they didn't have SIM cards; they also had a custom ROM on them that showed a Virgin Mobile logo when you turned on the phone, etc..

Yep, when I was with virgin, they were under SPRINT, and they used CDMA technology, which worked better than any of the GSM carriers around here, so until LTE rolled out I stuck with Virgin, now I use Hello Mobile, which uses T-Mobile towers around here, and service is great, 25 dollars a month gives me all the data I have ever needed. But I alway though Virgin mobile was pretty crafty with what they offered. they always tried to offer "Edgy" phones that were not only budget friendly for younger people, but also pretty cool for what they were.
---
Tim (kk4qbn)
+o kk4qbn.synchro.net
þ Synchronet þ KK4QBN BBS - kk4qbn.synchro.net - Chatsworth, GA USA

Re: luckymobile, anyone?
By: kk4qbn to Nightfox on Thu Apr 18 2024 04:33 pm

gives me all the data I have ever needed. But I alway though Virgin mobile was pretty crafty with what they offered. they always tried to offer "Edgy" phones that were not only budget friendly for younger people, but also pretty cool for what they were.

Yeah, I thought they offered cool phones. I don't know if Virgin Mobile exists anywhere else, but at least in my area, they were taken over by Boost Mobile. I had bought a Samsung Galaxy S20 phone right after Boost took over in 2020, and I noticed it was having problems staying connected to LTE/data - Often it would disconnect and re-connect. One day, I took it in to a Boost Mobile shop and asked the employee there if they could help. They ended up calling central company support.. That phone did have a SIM (though I heard the phone was still locked to Boost's network); they tried swapping the SIM but then it wouldn't connect. Eventually they swapped the original SIM back in, but the phone still wouldn't connect, and it basically became unusable, and the store employee said they were out of options and couldn't help more. I decided to sell that phone on eBay as-is (I mentioned what was going on), and I decided to buy an unlocked phone and went to Verizon to set up service with them. And someone did buy the Boost phone on eBay.

Nightfox

---
þ Synchronet þ Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.com

Re: luckymobile, anyone?
By: Nightfox to kk4qbn on Thu Apr 18 2024 03:39 pm

Yeah, I thought they offered cool phones. I don't know if Virgin Mobile exists anywhere else, but at least in my area, they were taken over by Boost Mobile. I had bought a Samsung Galaxy S20 phone right after Boost took over in 2020, and I noticed it was having problems staying connected to LTE/data - Often it would disconnect and re-connect. One day, I took it in to a Boost Mobile shop and asked the employee there if they could help. They ended up calling central company support.. That phone did have a SIM (though I heard the phone was still locked to Boost's network); they tried swapping the SIM but then it wouldn't connect. Eventually they swapped the original SIM back in, but the phone still wouldn't connect, and it basically became unusable, and the store employee said they were out of options and couldn't help more. I decided to sell that phone on eBay as-is (I mentioned what was going on), and I decided to buy an unlocked phone and went to Verizon to set up service with them. And

I've never been one who liked paying premium prices for a name. Yeah with some "premium" phones you do get better hardware, etc. I usually wait about 4 or 5 months until the "new" wears off a feature or service, and buy unlocked cheaper branded phones, never has steered me wrong and god forbid it gets stolen, dropped in a toilet, or ran over on I75 (all of this has happened to me) I'm not out too much money to replace it. :-)
---
Tim (kk4qbn)
+o kk4qbn.synchro.net
þ Synchronet þ KK4QBN BBS - kk4qbn.synchro.net - Chatsworth, GA USA