I have a router that is in the back of the house. there's clear line of sight to the front of the house, not that many feet to the front porch.
Anybody like me and live in a real old house with walls as hard as rocks?
I have a router that is in the back of the house. there's clear line of sight to the front of the house, not that many feet to the front porch. I have a big metal door and like i said the walls are hard as a rock.
I can barely get wifi to my front cameras. I even tried swapping out other routers and same deal. Also i have to use 2.5ghz for my dzees cameras.
Anyone have this issue with wifi not getting through? should i spend 40 bucks on a repeater that plugs in the wall?
Anybody like me and live in a real old house with walls as hard as rocks?I used power-line network adapters to create WiFi bridges and repeaters and the best solutions I've found are the mesh network systems:
I have a router that is in the back of the house. there's clear line of sight to the front of the house, not that many feet to the front porch. I have a big metal door and like i said the walls are hard as a rock.
I can barely get wifi to my front cameras. I even tried swapping out other routers and same deal. Also i have to use 2.5ghz for my dzees cameras.
Anyone have this issue with wifi not getting through? should i spend 40 bucks on a repeater that plugs in the wall?
https://www.amazon.com/NETGEAR-WiFi-Range-Extender-EX5000/dp/B083R46CV8/
https://www.amazon.com/Wifi-Extender-Booster-Wireless-Repeater/dp/B08RHD97QY
On Fri Oct 13 04:52:00 2023, fusion wrote to MRO <=-That would work potentially.
On 13 Oct 2023, MRO said the following...
I have a router that is in the back of the house. there's clear line of
sight to the front of the house, not that many feet to the front porch.
if your access point has removable antennas that are SMA you could maybe get a directional antenna and point it at the front of the house. then you could probably get wifi in a car out on the street too..
i feel like a repeater might add latency vs just running some ethernet and putting another AP closer..
One thing that could help might be to change the wifi channel that your router is using. If there are many other wifi access points in your area, using a different channel can help deal with interference, especially if everyone else is using the default wifi channel. I've heard it recommended to use either channel 1, 6, or 11 since they don't overlap in frequencies.i've been monkeying around with that. hasn't really helped much.
Re: Re: old houses and wifi
By: fusion to MRO on Fri Oct 13 2023 04:52 am
if your access point has removable antennas that are SMA you could maybe get a directional antenna and point it at the front of the house. then you could probably get wifi in a car out on the street too..yeah but i do have the ap pretty close. the freaking walls are just blocking everything. also the downstairs tv picks up the wifi fine and that's only a few feet from the porch. it also seems to vary with
i feel like a repeater might add latency vs just running some ethernet and putting another AP closer..
the weather.
perhaps a neighbor is on the same channel. i tried moving things around but i didn't notice anything. this is an intermittant issue.
Re: old houses and wifi
By: Nightfox to MRO on Fri Oct 13 2023 09:08 am
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B01H74VKZU
The thing about any networking devices that run over your power lines is that your power lines can make a big difference in their speed and how reliable they can work. I used a couple of powerline
ethernet adapters at my house (my previous place I lived), and sometimes they'd randomly get disconnected. At my current place, I never saw any disconnections.
I think a better option would be to run ethernet if possible.
yeah i already ran ethernet downstairs for the 2nd access point.
so it's either my thick ass walls or some other device interfering with
the 2.5 band. there's a wifi access points near me so that might be it.
this is going to sound stupid, but do you get much change in humidity inside? i say that because humidity can change properties ... usually outdoor links obviously are affected a lot, but if the walls are wet outside
how thick are the walls? what are they made from? any way you can put some pics up that we can take a butchers at?
and you say the ap is pretty close... define.. close :D
By: Nightfox to MRO on Fri Oct 13 2023 09:08 am
yea for sure.. it's definately hit n miss, but technology nowadays has made them a lot more robust for sure.
do you have a wifi scanner by chance?
heck better yet, do you have an SDR?what the hell is that.
the 2.4gig band... there's baby monitors and cameras etc and those chinesium
for exampl. stick a hobby 2.4 gig or 5.8 gig video receiver and drive around
MRO wrote to Digital Man <=-
I used power-line network adapters to create WiFi bridges and repeaters and the best solutions I've found are the mesh network systems: https://www.netgear.com/home/wifi/mesh/
oh boy those are expensive.
Re: Re: old houses and wifi
By: Charles Blackburn to MRO on Sat Oct 14 2023 10:47 am
how thick are the walls? what are they made from? any way you can put some pics up that we can take a butchers at?I don't know i didn't drill a hole in a wall and i don't know what they are made from. i would assume thick plaster and lath. the house is like 1900's.
I have bent a nail trying to hammer in nails in some places.
and you say the ap is pretty close... define.. close :Dlike 60-70 ft for downstairs.
upstairs one is directly above it and works the same sometimes. it fluctuates.
in the back i have a camera even farther away that is on my garage pointed at the house. the signal is listed as best possible. it's even farther than the cameras in the
front. Also i have old aluminum siding. so maybe the front wall of my house is super shielded.
MRO wrote to Digital Man <=-
I used power-line network adapters to create WiFi bridges and repeaters and the best solutions I've found are the mesh network systems: https://www.netgear.com/home/wifi/mesh/
oh boy those are expensive.
I ran powerline for years, as long as you have one breaker box they're great. I have 2 boxes, and signals on two powerline adapters on
different boxes would drop every 2 weeks or so, requiring me to go to
two floors and power-cycle them.
like 60-70 ft for downstairs.
upstairs one is directly above it and works the same sometimes.
it fluctuates.
well i want a wifi repeater that i can just plug in.
i'll see if i can get something to work. my house is too old to be running signals through the power lines.
Re: old houses and wifi
By: Charles Blackburn to MRO on Sat Oct 14 2023 10:51 am
you're quoting nightfox and replying to me.By: Nightfox to MRO on Fri Oct 13 2023 09:08 amyea for sure.. it's definately hit n miss, but technology nowadays has made them a lot more robust for sure.
do you have a wifi scanner by chance?i have a phone app.
geeky version of a scanner :Dheck better yet, do you have an SDR?what the hell is that.
the 2.4gig band... there's baby monitors and cameras etc and those chinesiumwe have a baby monitor upstairs too.
for exampl. stick a hobby 2.4 gig or 5.8 gig video receiver and drive aroundI don't even know where to get one of those.
I think i'm going to get a plug in repeater and put it right by the
front door.
btw, you need to change your bbs tagline
Re: Re: old houses and wifi
By: MRO to Charles Blackburn on Sat Oct 14 2023 04:55 pm
like 60-70 ft for downstairs.
upstairs one is directly above it and works the same sometimes.
it fluctuates.
I have a similar set up and had similar issues. I literally ran a cat 5 upstairs and plugged in a ubiquity AP and never looked back. It's surprising how there seems to be a WIFI shield between upstairs and downstairs. It's unbelievable really so I feel for you.
Re: Re: old houses and wifi
By: MRO to poindexter FORTRAN on Mon Oct 16 2023 02:28 am
well i want a wifi repeater that i can just plug in.
i'll see if i can get something to work. my house is too old to be running signals through the power lines.
I swapped out my ubiquity AP recently. I think I stil have the old one if you want to try it out and see if it works you can have the old one. The old one was still working okay.
at the house. the signal is listed as best possible. it's even farther than the cameras in the front.
Also i have old aluminum siding.
so maybe the front wall of my house is super shielded.
Re: Re: old houses and wifi
I have a similar set up and had similar issues. I literally ran a cat 5 upstairs and plugged in a ubiquity AP and never looked back. It's surprising how there seems to be a WIFI shield between upstairs and downstairs.
It's unbelievable really so I feel for you.
Re: Re: old houses and wifi
By: MRO to Charles Blackburn on Sat Oct 14 2023 04:55 pm
so i turned off the baby monitor and nothing helped.
then i'm out there running my wifi scanner app and i see how super saturated the area is due to the mini mansion next door that has a bunch of tenants.
so i'm going to go with having a repeater near my front door.
I didn't always have this issue but it appears that my neighbors are running a lot of wifi devices.
Re: Re: old houses and wifi
By: MRO to all on Tue Oct 17 2023 02:27:56
By: MRO to Charles Blackburn on Sat Oct 14 2023 04:55 pm
then i'm out there running my wifi scanner app and i see how super satu the area is due to the mini mansion next door that has a bunch of tenan so i'm going to go with having a repeater near my front door.
I didn't always have this issue but it appears that my neighbors are ru a lot of wifi devices.
yea plus probably runnin whatever devices/routers they have at full
power, yet if they dropped the power down a little their wifi would run even better as the APs
aren't "Yelling" at each other.
Charles Blackburn wrote to The Lizard Master <=-
yea, You would be surprised how much a piece of AC ducting reflects the signal.
On 17 Oct 2023, Charles Blackburn said the following...
yea plus probably runnin whatever devices/routers they have at full power, yet if they dropped the power down a little their wifi would run even better as the APswe're basically having this exact conversation:
aren't "Yelling" at each other.
Charles Blackburn wrote to The Lizard Master <=-
yea, You would be surprised how much a piece of AC ducting reflects the signal.I have several layers of soundproofing between floors, and it kills of
wifi.
I tried mesh, I tried wireiess extenders, I tried powerline - each
worked to some extent - but being able to have a router for my home
office with VLANs and to extend wifi, and backhaul the connection over gigabit ethernet is a godsend.
just because the wifi router is sending at 100mW and his phone only uses 20mW is not everything.... beleive me... 20mW is good enough to go at least 1/2 a mile with decent antennas.
from the AP and so forth. the main cause of stuff like this is interference from other routers/devices etc. if you sit and watch the video, he was like... "i forgot to turn on the second router/AP".... this was the reason why his phone kept disconnecting lol.
Charles Blackburn wrote to poindexter FORTRAN <=-
yea VLANs are great for segregation, but the problem is if you have something that's multicast (eg HDHomerun in my case), they can't cross subnets which sucks lol
Charles Blackburn wrote to poindexter FORTRAN <=-
yea VLANs are great for segregation, but the problem is if you have something that's multicast (eg HDHomerun in my case), they can't cros subnets which sucks lol
I have a homelab that I want to segment out, and I've always wanted to segment my IoT devices into their own network.
For most home uses, VLANs are probably overkill.
fusion wrote to poindexter FORTRAN <=-
i also have all the devices on my network labeled in iptraf.. just
watch the lan station monitor for new stuff and if something can't be accounted for i get suspicious ;) that's how i found out one of my tvs
was calling home even when it was off.. it's built in roku was pretty
old so i ended up just taking out the wifi password on there.
It does have a nightly report that gets emailed that shows new devices that connected in the last 24 hours - it's how I realized that iphones
and ipads by default randomize the MAC address.
I bought a Synology router, it's got some nice security
It does have a nightly report that gets emailed that shows
new devices that connected in the last 24 hours - it's how
I realized that iphones and ipads by default randomize the
MAC address.
Ogg wrote to poindexter FORTRAN <=-
Does it ever reuse the previous randomized MAC addresses? I
also thought MAC addresses were supposed to be unique to each
device, so eventually they would run out or conflict with
another device elsewhere?
Phigan wrote to poindexter FORTRAN <=-
I bought a Synology router, it's got some nice security
This article is talking about a Synology diskstation and not a
router, but interesting nonetheless, I think...
https://securityaffairs.com/152645
Re: Re: old houses and wifi
By: Charles Blackburn to fusion on Wed Oct 18 2023 04:20 pm
just because the wifi router is sending at 100mW and his phone only uses 20mW is not everything.... beleive me... 20mW is good enough to go at least 1/2 a mile with decent antennas.
are you saying a wifi router will transmit half a mile? NO way.
from the AP and so forth. the main cause of stuff like this is interference from other routers/devices etc. if you sit and watch the video, he was like... "i forgot to turn on the second router/AP".... this was the reason why his phone kept disconnecting lol.
i just skimmed it mostly but he said when he turned on his other router that's when things improved when he went to the back yard. he has too many devices and needed to split it between the two routers. he also messed around with router 1 when experimenting before this issue and increased the transmit power and that didn't help.
not sure what i think about the iphone MAC addresses.. great for privacy onI have a LAN for myself at home and then a LAN for the rest of the family (including a separate virtual VLAN) and this is one of the reasons.
Nowadays, I think a company would have to have a really good reason not
to just go with Google Workspace or Microsoft 365.
Nowadays, I think a company would have to have a really good reason not to
just go with Google Workspace or Microsoft 365.
It is still a common practice, but they can crush you quite hard for this sortof thing and there are some ugly precendents, so I think I would rather recomend to keep everything on-prem.
Arelor wrote to poindexter FORTRAN <=-
It is illegal to host your customer's data with an American company if
you are in Spain.
Is the issue with the company being American, or where the data is located? > s for speed and where you expect most of your users to be).
An American company, or an American company with your data hosted in
the US?
Arelor wrote to poindexter FORTRAN <=-
It is soooo much easier in practice to send your customer data to some
low costVPS in God-knows-what-country that usually that is what ends up happening anyway, hahahahaha.
Anybody like me and live in a real old house with walls as hard as rocks?
I have a router that is in the back of the house. there's clear line of sight to the front of the house, not that many feet to the front porch. I have a big metal door and like i said the walls are hard as a rock.
I can barely get wifi to my front cameras. I even tried swapping out other routers and same deal. Also i have to use 2.5ghz for my dzees cameras.
Anyone have this issue with wifi not getting through? should i spend 40 bucks on a repeater that plugs in the wall?
https://www.amazon.com/NETGEAR-WiFi-Range-Extender-EX5000/dp/B083R46CV8/
https://www.amazon.com/Wifi-Extender-Booster-Wireless-Repeater/dp/B08RHD97QY
now next time kids slash everyone's tires, i will have crystal clear pictures
it instead of a pit pixilation. that's what happened to 2 streets last mond
night. my car needed new tires anyways, but not this way. and they got the od ones.
now next time kids slash everyone's tires, i will have crystal clear pictures
it instead of a pit pixilation. that's what happened to 2 streets last mond
night. my car needed new tires anyways, but not this way. and they got the od ones.
Glad you got it figured out, and it sounds like just in time, too.
Re: old houses and wifiDispatching an officer to handle a slashed tire is a low priority IMHO. But at least an officer did go out to take statements but highly doubt the people responsible will ever get caught by our justice system.
By: Dumas Walker to MRO on Thu Feb 29 2024 08:51 am
also this was at 10:40pm and called in by my neighbor who is a police officer. his girlfriend saw it. also other people on the other street
saw it. then the kids ran off in different directions. i notice the police car on my street at 1:30am. some response time.
officer. his girlfriend saw it. also other people on the other street saw it. then the kids ran off in different directions. i notice the police car on my street at 1:30am. some response time.
Dispatching an officer to handle a slashed tire is a low priority IMHO. But at least an officer did go out to take statements but highly doubt the people responsible will ever get caught by our justice system.
Dispatching an officer to handle a slashed tire is a low priority IMHO. But at least an officer did go out to take statements but highly doubt the people responsible will ever get caught by our justice system.I am sorry that you have to deal with that. I hope that thing work out for you but I highly doubt the people responsible for this are going to get caught.
it wasn't just "a slashed tire". it was several blocks of slashed
tires. i provided a video but they did not post it or any information where anybody would see it.
it wasn't just "a slashed tire". it was several blocks of slashed tires. i provided a video but they did not post it or any information where anybody would see it.
I am sorry that you have to deal with that. I hope that thing work out for you but I highly doubt the people responsible for this are going to get caught.
Sysop: | Angel Ripoll |
---|---|
Location: | Madrid, Spain |
Users: | 11 |
Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
Uptime: | 161:03:01 |
Calls: | 476 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 14,051 |
Messages: | 66,572 |